Is the Alternative Equivalent?
How do we know an accessible alternative preserves what matters?
Final working session for Module 03. Check your study-guide explanations, then finish Challenge 03.
Challenge 03 Check-In
Open your team’s Quiz 1 Study Guide. Check the strongest topic, the topic that needs work, and any claim that still needs an authoritative source.
- Which of your three topics feels strongest?
- Which one still needs work?
- Which important claim still needs an authoritative source?
Alt Text Is a Judgment
What would someone miss if this image were gone?
For an informative image, write the meaning or function that matters. For a decorative image, use `alt=""`; in that context, the image adds no meaningful information.
Context changes the answer. The same image may need different alt text elsewhere. A chart, map, diagram, or other complex visual may need a longer equivalent so its important relationships and data are available.
Discuss the existing examples:
- For the bus-stop photograph, what information or function matters in the surrounding page?
- For the storefront illustration, when would `alt=""` be appropriate because its use is decorative in that context?
- For the map or attendance chart, what information would need to be preserved beyond a short alternative?
Media Alternatives in Practice
A short alt can identify a chart, map, diagram, or infographic and sometimes state its main point. If important information will not fit, add a longer equivalent: visible explanation, structured data, a table, directions, or another suitable representation. Preserve the information and relationships that matter, not every pixel.
Captions stay synchronized with audio and video. They include speech and meaningful non-speech sounds. Transcripts make the content available as separate readable text, but a transcript does not normally replace captions for video.
On a webpage, captions can use native HTML `<track kind="captions">` with a WebVTT file, or come from YouTube, Vimeo, Panopto, or a similar platform. Put a transcript below the media, inside native `<details>` / `<summary>`, or on a separate linked HTML page for longer content.
Short alt identifies the visual. The accessible equivalent communicates the information.
Discuss:
- What information or relationships would a short alternative leave out of the map, chart, or video?
- Watch once without sound. What disappears? Now imagine you cannot see it. What disappears then?
- Which implementation would best preserve that information in this context?
Suggested Topics for the Study Guide
- Module 01: Accessible According to Whom?
- ADA Title II, Section 504, and the role and scope of Section 508.
- WCAG and W3C.
- POUR.
- WCAG success criteria and A / AA / AAA conformance.
- Authoritative sources and evidence.
- The limits of legal compliance, institutional policy, and WCAG conformance as complete measures.
- The recurring question: How do you know?
- Module 02: Can You See What Matters?
- Color dependence.
- Text contrast and non-text contrast.
- Text resizing, browser zoom, and reflow.
- Clipping, overlap, and loss of content or function.
- Visual cues such as color, shape, position, boundaries, and state.
- Testing with tools such as WAVE and contrast checkers.
- Tool output is evidence to investigate, not a final accessibility verdict.
- Redesigning and retesting a claim.
- Module 03: What Does This Media Say?
- Informative versus decorative images.
- `alt=""` for decorative images.
- How context changes the appropriate text alternative.
- Communicating meaning or function instead of describing every pixel.
- Complex visuals such as charts, maps, diagrams, and infographics.
- Short alternatives versus longer descriptions, visible explanations, or structured data.
- Captions and transcripts.
- Meaningful visual information in video.
- The difference between audio information and visual information.
- Whether an alternative actually preserves what matters.
Use your Challenge 03 topics, earlier Class Work, course resources, and authoritative sources to decide what belongs in your study guide.
Cross-Check the Study Guide
Exchange one Challenge 03 topic with another team. No separate submission or formal peer-review form is required.
- Identify one thing that is clear.
- Identify one thing that seems incomplete or oversimplified.
- Identify one claim that should be checked against an authoritative source.
Finish Challenge 03
Use the rest of class to revise and finish your Quiz 1 Study Guide section.
The three team submissions will be archived together as part of the class review material for Quiz 1.
Build the Quiz 1 Study Guide
Open Challenge 03 →